Error loading page.
Try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, there may be a network issue, and you can use our self test page to see what's preventing the page from loading.
Learn more about possible network issues or contact support for more help.

The Car That Knew Too Much

Can a Machine Be Moral?

ebook
1 of 1 copy available
1 of 1 copy available
The inside story of the groundbreaking experiment that captured what people think about the life-and-death dilemmas posed by driverless cars.
Human drivers don't find themselves facing such moral dilemmas as "should I sacrifice myself by driving off a cliff if that could save the life of a little girl on the road?" Human brains aren't fast enough to make that kind of calculation; the car is over the cliff in a nanosecond. A self-driving car, on the other hand, can compute fast enough to make such a decision—to do whatever humans have programmed it to do. But what should that be? This book investigates how people want driverless cars to decide matters of life and death.
In The Car That Knew Too Much, psychologist Jean-François Bonnefon reports on a groundbreaking experiment that captured what people think cars should do in situations where not everyone can be saved. Sacrifice the passengers for pedestrians? Save children rather than adults? Kill one person so many can live? Bonnefon and his collaborators Iyad Rahwan and Azim Shariff designed the largest experiment in moral psychology ever: the Moral Machine, an interactive website that has allowed people —eventually, millions of them, from 233 countries and territories—to make choices within detailed accident scenarios. Bonnefon discusses the responses (reporting, among other things, that babies, children, and pregnant women were most likely to be saved), the media frenzy over news of the experiment, and scholarly responses to it.
Boosters for driverless cars argue that they will be in fewer accidents than human-driven cars. It's up to humans to decide how many fatal accidents we will allow these cars to have.
  • Creators

  • Publisher

  • Release date

  • Formats

  • Languages

  • Reviews

    • Publisher's Weekly

      October 11, 2021
      Bonnefon (Reasoning Unbound), research director at the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, offers an enlightening analysis of the moral and ethical problems surrounding autonomous cars. He starts with the results from a survey in which participants had to choose between scenarios in which a self-driving car could go straight and hit 10 pedestrians, or swerve and hit one: “In all of the scenarios... the participants were in agreement that self-driving cars should save the greatest number of people.” Universal agreement notwithstanding, Bonnefon demonstrates that this ideal is a complicated. For example, Bonnefon notes, when consumers were asked if they would buy a self-driving car that was programmed to prioritize saving a larger number of people, but in doing so would sacrifice the driver, many buyers balked. This conundrum leads Bonnefon to speculate that “in order to save more lives, we may have to program autonomous cars... to save fewer!” Bonnefon considers such complicated questions with tact and curiosity, and his own research is fascinating, as with a site that he built called The Moral Machine that provides interactive accident scenarios.This is a thoughtful and provocative look at a timely concern.

Formats

  • Kindle Book
  • OverDrive Read
  • EPUB ebook

Languages

  • English

Loading